Skip to main content

Thersa May Wants To SACRIFICE TROOPS While Giving Cash To The Bankers

Let us look at the prime ministers appalling voting record that reveals her disregard for democracy and willingness to go to war.
She almost always votes in favor of using force, she voted for the disastrous Iraq war and replacing Britains Nuclear arsenal with a newer system, however despite being willing to sacrifice troops on poorly thought out operations she has voted against improving access to service people and their families.

Theresa May hates poor people so much that she voted against raising welfare benefits in line with price rises this goes along with voting against extra support for disabled people and young people who have been in long-term unemployment, and when this has become too depressing she has voted against allowing terminally ill people from ending their lives, she would rather they rot and suffer with less and less.

The prime minister also likes to tax those on lower incomes while lowering the taxes for bankers and higher earners. She has voted to increase the VAT rate and against raising taxes on those earning over £150,000 and was against bankers bonus taxes. What a coincidence it is that her husband works for a financial institution and probably earns over £150,000 per year.

Why do you think the PM has a problem with supporting troops and not rich bankers?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Labour's Workers' Rights Overhaul: A Mirage of Progress in Capitalist Britain

Labour's Workers' Rights Overhaul: A Mirage of Progress in Capitalist Britain In a move touted as the "biggest upgrade in employment rights for a generation," Britain's newly-minted Labour government has unveiled an ambitious package of workers' rights reforms. While the bourgeois press hails this as a triumph for the working class, a deeper analysis reveals the inherent contradictions and limitations of such reforms within the capitalist system. The Illusion of Change: Examining Labour's Employment Rights Bill The Employment Rights Bill, introduced roughly 100 days into Labour's tenure, presents a veneer of progress that ultimately serves to maintain the status quo of worker exploitation. Let us dissect the key elements of this legislation and expose its true nature. Sick Pay and Parental Leave: Crumbs from the Capitalist Table Among the headline measures are changes to sick pay and parental leave entitlements. Workers will now be able to claim s...

Origins of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism

Origins of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism Introduction to Marxism-Leninism-Maoism Source: i.ytimg.com Marxism-Leninism-Maoism represents a confluence of ideas that have catalyzed some of the most significant movements in modern history. This political philosophy builds on the class analysis of Karl Marx, the revolutionary tactics of Vladimir Lenin, and the strategic insights of Mao Zedong. Introduction to Marxism-Leninism-Maoism Marxism-Leninism-Maoism  is an ideology synthesizing Marx's analyzation of capitalistic societies, Lenin's theories on the revolutionary vanguard and proletarian state, and Mao's contributions, particularly in guerrilla warfare and peasant mobilization. The tripartite theory, though formally structured post-Mao, draws foundational principles from each leader’s intellectual legacy. It addresses the dynamics of power, economics, and class struggle, aimed at dismantling capitalist structures and implementing a communist society. Echoing Marx, it retains the c...

UK's Partial Arms Embargo on Israel: A Facade of Humanitarian Concern Amidst Imperialist Contradictions

 In a move that reveals the inherent contradictions within capitalist-imperialist alliances, the United Kingdom has announced a partial suspension of arms exports to Israel. This decision, ostensibly driven by concerns over potential violations of international humanitarian law, lays bare the complex interplay of economic interests, geopolitical maneuvering, and public opinion that shape the foreign policies of imperialist nations. The Illusion of Moral High Ground Foreign Secretary David Lammy, in addressing Parliament, attempted to cloak this decision in the language of humanitarian concern. He stated that the UK government had concluded there is a "clear risk" that certain items could be used to "commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law." This rhetoric, while seemingly noble, serves to obscure the deeper economic and political motivations behind the UK's actions. The suspension affects approximately 30 out of 350 existing exp...